Stilton’s Place

Stilton’s Place

Hit and Misogyny
While today’s cartoon might appear to be a clear example of blatant misogyny, it is actually “meta” misogyny which celebrates and empowers women by ironically mocking those who would mischaracterize misogyny for their own political benefit. Like this bitch, for instance.

Again, “meta” misogyny in the service of humor! Jon Swift (the author of the seminal work on politics, “Gullible’s Travails”) would totally be high-fiving us about now.

The (ahem) “news” story, if you were lucky enough to have missed it, is that Hillary Clinton has returned from 40 years of God-ordained wandering in the wilderness, fasting and having religious visions, to face the cold hard facts about her election loss. And according to Hillary, those facts are that the Russians magically hacked the election, FBI Director James Comey was a suicide bomber, and everybody in America – including women – hates women.

“Certainly misogyny played a role,” the bitter, garishly-dressed, stringy-haired old woman whined, “That just has to be admitted.”

Well, no, it doesn’t have to be admitted. There are female leaders all over the world, and countless women in positions of authority – including governmental authority – here in the United States. So it seems likely that Hillary’s unpopularity isn’t so much linked to her gender as it is tied to her long history of being a horrible human being, serial liar, inept politician, rape enabler, and thief.

All of which might become clear to Hillary if, instead of looking for answers in a “glass ceiling,” she looked for them in a mirror.

BONUS: STICKING HIS NECK OUT

Meanwhile, as the clock ticks on Syria, Russia, Iran, and North Korea…

Toon in

How much more equality can we take?

There is a large chance that the voting public in other states will require palliative care if this Squaw tries a run for POTUS. Fauxahontas has a fervent belief that she has been given a gift from Manitou which includes absolution from any and all transgressions.

Oops! Elizabeth Warren Pays Her Female

Staffers FAR Less Than the Guys

An embarrassing new report published on Equal Pay Day reveals that Elizabeth Warren, reigning left-wing queen of false ethnicity claims and socialist hopes and dreams, actually pays her female staffers much less than their male compatriots.

Shocked? Me neither.

Our friends over at the Free Beacon crunched a few numbers and discovered Warren’s female staffers make an average of 71 cents for every dollar her male employees earn – nearly 10 cents less than the national average of 79.6 cents per dollar. The Free Beacon notes:

The median annual earnings for women staffers, $52,750, was more than $20,000 less than the median annual earnings for men, $73,750, according to the analysis of publicly available Senate data.

When calculated using average salaries rather than median, the pay gap expands to just over $26,051, or about 31 percent.

The report added only one woman on Warren’s payroll earned a six-figure salary. (That would be her director of scheduling, sitting pretty at $100,624.88.)

However, five guys out-earned this lady by miles, including Warren’s director of oversight and investigations ($156,000), legislative director ($149,458), deputy chief of staff ($119,375), Massachusetts state director ($152,310), and deputy state director ($113,750).

The Free Beacon explained they only calculated the wage difference based on the salaries of Warren’s full-time staff who were employed for the whole year – meaning the disparity isn’t because, for example, some female staffers only worked three days a week for six months.

It’s a pretty shameful reveal for the Democratic senator from Massachusetts, who’s used the so-called “gender wage gap” myth as a political soapbox for years. She even tweeted last year on last year’s Equal Pay Day, calling it a “national day of embarrassment.” [snip]

It certainly is an embarrassment, but then there isn’t much about her public life that isn’t.
She is all mouth with no known skills that make any real difference to her constituency.

But then they voted for her which bespeaks volumes to their mental condition.

Stilton’s Place

Stilton’s Place

Dirty Rice

Burn, baby, burn.

It now appears that one of the chief mischief-makers behind the surveillance and information leaks related to the Trump administration is Obama crony and serial liar Susan Rice. According to a growing number of reports, she asked intelligence agencies to break with traditional policies and tell her the names of Trump associates who were (ahem) “accidentally” caught on surveillance tapes, as well as the content of their conversations.

This would, of course, only be a problem if Ms. Rice was a reprehensible person working in cahoots with a cabal of Machiavellian anti-Americans who intended to use the information for political purposes. In other words, this is one hell of a problem.

Rice has adamantly declared that she did nothing wrong, adding “I leaked nothing to nobody.” Which, by the inflexible rules pertaining to the use of double negatives, means that she leaked everything to everybody.  No doubt with considerable help from Barack Obama, who spontaneously (why does that word keep coming up in association with Susan Rice?) changed the rules pertaining to inter-agency sharing of raw intelligence just before leaving office in order to ensure as much damage to the incoming Trump administration as possible.

And speaking of Barry, just where is he while all this damning information is coming out…?

AND FROM THE VAULT…

When it comes to forgiving and forgetting, we don’t do either.

Day by Day

Collectivist Banking

How much longer do you believe this idiocy can continue? We have debased the currency to the point where the Government plays games with the Fed to keep interest rates low while lying about there being no inflation.
They can squander the money on worthless programs to keep themselves in office, or fess up and pay that money on soaring interest rates on the growing debt. You seen the choice they made.

The big question is,

“Why keep voting for them?”


No inflation. Pssst…I have this bridge you might be interested in…from Rico

Inflation? What inflation?
There’s NO inflation here! That’s why the 2017 COLA increased by only 0.3% [for Congress and Common Core math students that is 3/10 of ONE percent.]

But hey! Good news, in the last ten years (1996-2016) TV prices have fallen by 100%.
Huzzah!

Rejoice happy debt slaves.
Your beloved FED (that privately owned, for-profit bank) is staying under it’s inflation rate target of 2%.

Never you mind that the consumer items indexed on the attached charts reflects an overall inflation rate of +57.1%.

  • Food and Housing are up >50%.
  • Health Care and Child Care are up >100%.
  • College Tuition is up >200%.

Feeling better now?

Have you figured out how all this happened? Look back to LBJ’s “Great Society”. LBJ had to pay for the Viet Nam War; he didn’t want to take any tax dollars to fund that since his agenda required increased spending as is.

There was a Pot o’ Gold to be had and the Congress gave it to him: The Social Security Fund. The Fund was removed from it’s protected place and put into the general fund and spent on the war, his failed Great Society and every social program that Congressional members found for their districts. The Fund never was put back into it’s protected place. Now Social Security is failing too.

If the SS fund were to be removed from the General Fund, the National Debt would soar, spending would have to be curtailed AND taxes go up considerably. All because of American’s greed for current FREE lifestyle and still wanting a future payoff too.

You’re not going to get it.

Do not read this while drinking any liquids

The following contains inadvertent humor. The person speaking to this subject has no clue as to how ridiculous she sounds. Also, she believes that this subject matter is gospel. Sobeit.

Public Broadcasting CEO: People ‘Yearn For Content They Can Trust’

Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) President and CEO Patricia de Stacy Harrison says “people in this country yearn for content they can trust” and that’s among the reasons taxpayer funding is necessary for the organization.

On Tuesday, Harrison testified at a hearing on President Trump’s proposed cuts to public broadcasting, where she claimed the CPB is vital.

“So, people in this country yearn for content they can trust. And where are we right now? We are living in this environment of fake news,” Harrison said.

“I have kids, I have grandchildren, we are very proud of our commitment through CPB, the appropriation, to funding fact-based journalism.”

“We have a priority for editorial integrity,” Harrison added.

You are allowed to laugh now.

Fact-based journalism that includes Charlie Rose prefacing a question to Bill Clinton with, “Let’s assume that you make it to heaven.”

Editorial integrity that allows PBS host Tavis Smiley to claim there are far more Christian terrorists than Muslim ones.

Or Smiley’s fact-based stance that by not holding a confirmation vote on Merrick Garland for a Supreme Court justice seat, the GOP will reconsider the ban on slavery and the right for women to vote.

There are plenty of other examples that CPB pushes a liberal agenda over the airwaves with taxpayer dollars.

Surprisingly absent from Harrison’s “vital” reasons for continued taxpayer funding of public broadcasting, was her $434,364 salary that she made in 2015.

Wonder why she left out that vital bit of information? THAT is quite instructive to the taxpayer as to whether to remove the Federal funding for this treasury draining program.
For those that wish to support PBS, there isn’t a ting stopping you. Put your money up there in the form of a personal check.
Just don’t ask others to do that.