Moms against everything

The fearful cry for security can only come from someone who cannot or will not take responsibility for their own safety and security. Now these “Snowflakes in Training” are encouraged by their elders to pick up placards and demand someone else (in this case Pres. Trump) do something to fix school shootings. They want ‘Someone Else’ to solve their problem. Ask the S’flakes, they haven’t a clue. Ask the parents and you will get a batch of Bloomberg talking points, none which have any value to reality.

There are over 20,000 laws, Federal, State and Local governing guns, who may carry, how they may be carried and where they may be carried.
To all those Snowflakes holding signs, Mr Cruz didn’t care about those laws. 20,000 plus another 10,000 laws would make no difference to him or any other individual who wants to shoot up your school and YOU. Your school had TWO resource officers aka COPS there that day. How did that work out for you? No blame falls on them, their training doesn’t include “How to be in two places at the same time.

Why didn’t the police do something about Cruz? According to the police, he didn’t commit a crime. Being weird doesn’t fall into that category; if it did most of the world’s Snowflake population would be incarcerated.

The FBI admits to missing this one completely. Probably too busy with the ‘Russia-Russia-Russia’ thing. Face facts, in the DC orbit, a few dead kids is dust on the desk top. Trump came down to the hospital. You think Obama would have visited?

You want solutions to living in fear of another school shooting? Become homeschooled, attend a private school that doesn’t take government funding. Attend a private school that has armed security like Sidwell Friends where all the elite politicians send their kids.

Insist that the politicians repeal the idiot laws mandating Gun Free Zones for schools. Insist that qualified faculty be armed. This shouldn’t be hard to do since you’ll be talking to Liberals and Democrats plus a few RINO’s. Do you think their kids are going to he same schools you are attending? Believe it and you need to get out more often.
They have armed security. They live in gated communities with armed security. They’re safe, you’re not.
You don’t read about gun stores, gun shows getting shot up or police stations either. No, it’s only those places that are Gun Free and publicly make it known.

The police aren’t there to protect you personally; their responsibility is to the community. When a crime is committed, they investigate and capture the perp, bring them to justice. You are responsible for your own well being and safety. If you want the State to provide that kind of security, this is what you want.

There are plenty of places where one can have that level of security: Cuba, China, Vietnam, Venezuela, Iran, Turkey, Russia to name the more prominent ones. France does an excellent job too. So do Paraguay and Uruguay. And as a bonus, you won’t have to put up with any of the silly free speech rights from the opposing side.

 

Advertisements

Biased Agendas

Another call to ban guns comes from none other than that bastion of idiocy, The New York Times. Leave it to them to attempt a different slant for ridding the planet, or at least America, of guns.

Another Op-Ed piece, echoing a prior screed calls for the repeal of the Second Amendment. One has to believe in their fevered mind that that is a possibility. They must believe it would be no more difficult than it was in removing the Volstead Act. Here’s a bit of the Op-Ed author’s reasoning.

NYT Columnist: Let’s Repeal the Second Amendment

Back in October, after the Las Vegas Shooting, New York Times columnist Bret Stephens argued that the Second Amendment should be repealed. Since Wednesday’s shooting in South Florida, Stephens’ OpEd has re-circulated across social media, which eventually led to another OpEd pushing for repealing the Second Amendment.

In Stephens’ October piece, he mentioned that gun control advocates frequently lose the debate on gun laws because they get their facts wrong:

…why do liberals keep losing the gun control debate?

Maybe it’s because they argue their case badly and — let’s face it — in bad faith. Democratic politicians routinely profess their fidelity to the Second Amendment — or rather, “a nuanced reading” of it — with all the conviction of Barack Obama’s support for traditional marriage, circa 2008. People recognize lip service for what it is.

Then there are the endless liberal errors of fact. There is no “gun-show loophole” per se; it’s a private-sale loophole, in other words the right to sell your own stuff. The civilian AR-15 is not a true “assault rifle,” and banning such rifles would have little effect on the overall murder rate, since most homicides are committed with handguns. It’s not true that 40 percent of gun owners buy without a background check; the real number is closer to one-fifth.

The National Rifle Association does not have Republican “balls in a money clip,” as Jimmy Kimmel put it the other night. The N.R.A. has donated a paltry $3,533,294 to all current members of Congress since 1998, according to The Washington Post, equivalent to about three months of Kimmel’s salary. The N.R.A. doesn’t need to buy influence: It’s powerful because it’s popular.

At least he recognized his side has their so-called “facts” wrong. [snip]

The Amendments 11 through 27 are stand alone to wit were added to the Constitution after it was signed and ratified. Those can be added and removed by Congress and by approval of ¾ of the States, now numbering 38.
However the Second Amendment is in whole, part of the Constitution and would require a repeal of the that document to get rid of it. Good-bye to Amendments #1 and #3 through #10 also.
This mushwit, Bret Stephens, obviously isn’t much of of a Constitutional scholar. More likely, just some halfwit scribbler with a axe-grinding agenda. What one expects from a so called paper mostly used as a fishwrap.

Toon in

The Great Liberal Misnomer

It seems that the so-called ‘Gun Free Zones” are not gun free. Some miscreant invades that ‘sanctified’ zone with such a banned item, intent on visiting mayhem upon the unarmed. Then he obvious question is asked, “How do we prevent this?” The penultimate question should be, “How do we stop this?” which is different.

The answer to the latter is always we send in a gun(s) to terminate this activity. In security terms, this is called a reaction force and is always late and and bodies short. The former question’s answer is to have guns in place carries by individuals with permits and who are proficient in their use. While this may not prevent some deaths it does cut down on reaction time, limiting the number of victims and possibility preventing any injuries.

Two more items that go far in changing the landscape on these events. One is getting rid of the idiot concept of “Gun Free Zones”, they aren’t and just another Liberal bit of stupidity. Second is to stop the press conferences. Give a sheet to the press with basic data and stop giving publicity to the bozos who commit these acts. Let the press do what they do best; make up stories to fit their fantasy world. They are going to do that anyway.

Be safe in…

…a gun FREE Society.

Mélange

How long could you survive if you didn’t know this? Would you be shunned by those virile snowflakes at Mobe’s Trans & Undecided Gym? Have no fear. Loon Watch gives you this vital NEWS!

Jimmy Garoppolo Will Earn More From Super Bowl 52 Than Tom Brady. Really

In what world would Jimmy Garoppolo earn more from Super Bowl LII than Tom Brady? Try this world.

Because of a strange intersection between the NFL’s collective bargaining agreement and state tax laws, the former New England Patriots quarterback is set to take home more (after income taxes) from the Super Bowl than Brady—even though Garoppolo isn’t even on the Patriots, let alone leading them. [snip]

Now that you have been enlightened, it won’t bee necessary to swill the Melantonin to get a night’s sleep.

If this doesn’t put the freude in the shaden, nothing will.

Reporter rushes to Kentucky school shooting – and learns the alleged gunman is her son

It was a journalist’s worst nightmare

The editor of the Marshall County Daily Online raced to the county’s high school Tuesday morning after reports that shots had been fired.

She arrived to discover that the alleged shooter was her own son, said her colleague Ann Beckett, who told Courier Journal she went to comfort the editor and take over the story.

Mulitple people who know the family or have direct knowledge of the incident confirmed the identity of the boy, 15-year-old Gabe Parker, who is accused of pulling out a handgun and fatally shooting two classmates and wounding 14 other people just before classes were to begin. [snip]

One has to wonder just what kind of boilerplate story replete with a farrago of liberal anti-gun cant was being mentally constructed only to get an icy blast of reality.

Peccable reflections

The Party of “Truth, Light and Brotherly Love”, yes that very one that accuses the GOP, conservatives and all “Deplorables” of being racist SOB’s and bigots of the worst kind, produced this colorful character, a fundraiser from Missouri.

Democratic Fundraiser Charged With Racially Motivated Gun Crime

Well, this is a wild story, albeit a local one, coming from Missouri. A top fundraiser for the Democratic Party has been arrested and charged with a racially motivated gun crime. Matthew Lieberman is accused of drawing a handgun at two locations, firing shots, and shouting racial epithets. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported that surveillance footage captured Lieberman with a firearm, along with shell casings at the scene that matched those found in his car. He was arrested on November 29. His bail has been set at $250,000 (via St. Louis Post-Dispatch):

Veteran Democratic fundraiser Matthew Lieberman has been charged with multiple felony gun crimes after allegedly firing a handgun and shouting racial slurs at eyewitnesses at two businesses Tuesday.

Lieberman pointed a handgun at someone at the Amoco gas station on Skinker Boulevard and Highway 40 (Interstate 64) while using racial epithets just after 11 p.m. Tuesday, according to court documents. He then allegedly fired multiple shots at the building from his car.

In court documents, investigators said surveillance footage showed Lieberman with the gun, and bullet casings at the scene matched the make and model of bullet casings found in Lieberman’s car.

Less than 15 minutes later, Lieberman was at the Jack in the Box on Hampton Avenue, shouting racial epithets at maintenance workers, according to court documents. He fired a gun several times from a Mercedes sedan, the documents say.

[…]

Lieberman, 38, was arrested Wednesday and now faces charges of unlawful use of a weapon and armed criminal action. One weapons charge includes a hate crime enhancement, with officers reporting that Lieberman’s “conduct and use of epithets indicate his actions to be motivated by race.”

You never can wonder more about the depths of hypocrisy that the Jackass Party can sink. From groping and grabbing to treason to gun control BS, they step in the stink thigh high.